Recall James Pfaff
  • Intro
  • Recall Effort
  • Questions for Mr Pfaff
  • Resources
    • Breaking News
    • Documents
    • Homeless Claim
    • Links
  • Citizen Comments
  • Submit Comments
Select Page

Questions for Mr. Pfaff

(Mr. Pfaff has yet to answer any of the actual questions.)

Question: Why does Mr. Pfaff keep using terms such as: it is my “feeling” I satisfied the residency requirement – or – it was my “intent” to satisfy the residency requirement? Why is it that Mr. Pfaff cannot produce credible evidence that he actually satisfied the Woodland Park 12-month residency requirement to run for City Council?

Question: Why did Mr. Pfaff sign an affidavit under penalties of perjury attesting that he satisfied the Woodland Park 12-month residency requirement if he cannot produce any evidence, let alone credible evidence, that he actually satisfied the Woodland Park 12-month residency requirement?

Question: Producing residency evidence normally is an easy, quick, and straightforward process. What is Mr. Pfaff hiding by not producing such evidence?

Question: Philip Donner, the Investigator for the District Attorney, Fourth Judicial District Investigator, states Mr. Pfaff’s Colorado driver’s license was issued on January 23, 2019, and shows the Bristlecone Campground address. Individuals must present at least two credible forms of evidence such as utility bills or Post Office evidence to the Colorado Department of Motor Vehicles when applying for a driver’s license. What evidence did Mr. Pfaff provide to the DMV that he resided at the Bristlecone Campground as of January 23, 2019, when he applied for his driver’s license?

Question: The Woodland Park Police Department possess documents showing Mr. Pfaff moved his camper trailer into Bristlecone Campground on May 26, 2019. If this is the case, how could Mr. Pfaff legally claim he actually resided at Bristlecone Campground as of January 23, 2019, when he applied for his Colorado driver’s license?

Question: If the Woodland Park Police Department possess documents showing Mr. Pfaff moved his camper trailer into Bristlecone Campground on May 26, 2019, where did Mr. Pfaff reside from April 7, 2019, to May 26, 2019? What proof does Mr. Pfaff have where he actually lived during this time period?

Question: Under Colorado law, living in a recreational vehicle in a campground is not a basis for establishing residency. However, if an elector is “homeless”, then living in a recreational vehicle in a campground may be a basis for establishing residency. Why does Mr. Pfaff claim his residency is established based on him being “homeless” when the “homeless” exception applies only to electors (i.e., voters) when registering to vote. It does not apply to candidates for public office to establish residency. Further. Mr. Pfaff owns a home in Indiana (and possibly elsewhere). Even if the “homeless” exception applies to candidates for public office to establish residency, it seems unlikely that “homelessness” can be used to establish residency when living in a recreational vehicle in a campground when the person actually owns a home.

Question: With respect to the screenshot related to Mr. Pfaff’s Check #5048 that he presented to the Woodland Park City Clerk on January 3, 2020, as evidence he made a deposit to Bristlecone Campground (payee not shown on the screenshot) on April 1 (year not shown on the screenshot), will Mr. Pfaff provide a copy of both sides of the canceled check (with confidential information redacted)?

Question: Attached to Mr. Pfaff’s February 2, 2020 email to the Woodland Park City Attorney is a “letter” allegedly from Bristlecone Campground attesting to Mr. Pfaff’s “intention” to reside in Woodland Park. Will an owner of Bristlecone Campground publicly verify: (1) all the assertions in the “letter”; (2) the “letter” was actually signed by an authorized person on behalf of Bristlecone Campground; and (3) the title of the Bristlecone Campground signatory?

Question: What date did Mr. Pfaff actually park his trailer in Bristlecone Campground? What proof does Mr. Pfaff have to back-up this date?

Question: What date did Mr. Pfaff start to occupy his trailer in Bristlecone Campground and has he done so constantly since that date? What proof does Mr. Pfaff have to back-up this date?

Question: Mr. Pfaff claims he parked his trailer in a friend’s parking lot in Colorado before moving into Bristlecone Campground. Was that parking lot in the City of Woodland Park? What is the name of the owner and the location of the parking lot? What proof does Mr. Pfaff have to back-up this allegation? Will the owner of that parking lot publicly verify Mr. Pfaff’s claim?

Question: Mr. Pfaff claims he does not own the camper trailer parked at Bristlecone Campground and, therefore, it still has Indiana license plates on it. He also claims he took over the payments on the camper trailer and will register the camper trailer in Colorado as soon as he makes the final payment and the title is transferred into Mr. Pfaff’s name. What proof does Mr. Pfaff have that he is actually making payments on the camper trailer to back-up this allegation?

Question: Why do Mr. Pfaff’s videos most always show him in a vehicle or with a green screen behind him? Is he not in Woodland Park when producing those videos? Too, isn’t it odd that he spent the entire 6+ hour December 3, 2020, City Council meeting conducted via Zoom sitting outside at his home in Indiana in near-freezing temperatures? What is up with that?

Question: Why does Mr. Pfaff want to eliminate Woodland Park zoning ordinances and comprehensive planning? Would Mr. Pfaff feel the same way if he actually owned property in Woodland Park and intended to stay in our community for the long-term? If zoning ordinances and comprehensive planning are eliminated, how would Mr. Pfaff feel if he actually owned a home in Woodland Park and a junkyard (or any other nuisance) could be established on the lot next to Mr. Pfaff’s property?

Question: Why does Mr. Pfaff frequently disrespect and bully City residents, City employees, and other members of the City Council?

Question: Why does Mr. Pfaff blame a former City Manager for decisions made by former City Councils and for former resident approved initiatives?

Question: Why did Mr. Pfaff change the legal name of his company, Innovative Research & Data Solutions, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (Entity ID# 2009119248) to his personal name on March 18, 2020 – shortly before the April 2020 election? He then changed the company name back to Innovative Research and Data Solutions, LLC on May 1, 2020 – shortly after the April 2020 election. What is Mr. Pfaff hiding?

Question: Why does Mr. Pfaff intentionally and erroneously use his PO Box address when Colorado law requires a street address? For instance, on March 18, 2020, when filing Document # 20201245759 with the Colorado Secretary of State for Innovative Research and Data Solutions, LLC, as Registered Agent, Mr. Pfaff used his PO Box address of 743 Gold Hill Place, #46, Woodland Park, CO 80863 instead of the required street address.

Question: Does Mr. Pfaff use his PO Box address when Colorado law requires a street address on any other occasions?

Question: Mr. Pfaff is associated with: (1) Novex Contact Solutions LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Entity # L11000512); and (2) SBO Marketing Group LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Entity # L10851004). For both companies, Mr. Pfaff is the Statutory Agent and he represents that his address is: 2733 N Power Rd #102 PMB 200, Mesa, AZ 85215. This address appears to be a PO Box at a UPS Store in Mesa. Does Arizona law allow a Statutory Agent to use a PO Box? Further, Mr. Pfaff is reported as a “Principal” of both companies with an address of 2558 N. Rowan Circle, Mesa, AZ 85207. Does Mr. Pfaff also own a home in Arizona? What is the business of each of these companies? Are there any conflicts of interest presented as a result of Mr. Pfaff’s interest in these companies?

Question: What other companies does Mr. Pfaff have an interest in? What is the business of these other companies? Are there any conflicts of interest presented as a result of Mr. Pfaff’s interest?

Return to Top